Syria Signals Openness to Security Dialog with Israel
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani indicated Damascus is open to security talks with Israel, citing a potential "historic opportunity" for stability.
Lauren Collins ·

Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani recently conveyed Damascus's readiness to re-engage in security negotiations with Israel. Speaking on Sunday, al-Shaibani characterized this as a potential "historic opportunity" for Israel. These remarks emerge amidst ongoing regional tensions and a prolonged cessation of discussions aimed at establishing a security framework between the two nations.
Prior talks had been suspended following an escalation in the US-Israel conflict with Iran. While acknowledging a current deficit of trust in Israel's commitment to a resolution, al-Shaibani stressed the critical importance of resuming dialogue for broader regional stability. Diplomatic efforts, primarily orchestrated by the United States, are concentrating on mediating a security agreement between Syria and Israel.
Conditions for Dialogue Resumption
According to al-Shaibani, a security agreement was reportedly nearing finalization earlier in the year but remains contingent on Israel ceasing its military strikes against Syrian assets. Israel has maintained a military presence in southwest Syria since 2024, citing security concerns and the necessity to prevent the deployment of foreign forces, including those from Turkey. For Damascus, the immediate cessation of Israeli airstrikes is a primary prerequisite before any extensive discussions can commence regarding the Golan Heights and the prospect of a long-term peace settlement.
Despite continuous mediation efforts by the United States, a definitive date for the restart of these crucial talks has not yet been established. The historical context of conflict between Syria and Israel dates back to 1948, a state of animosity further aggravated by Israel's capture of the Golan Heights from Syria during the 1967 Six-Day War.
US Mediation and Future Outlook
Last week, US Special Envoy for Syria, Tom Barrack, affirmed Washington's active involvement in implementing a mechanism designed to prevent further regional conflict. This follows more than a year of US attempts to broker a security arrangement, which have faced challenges due to Israel's military incursions into Syrian territory and attacks on government facilities. Al-Shaibani reiterated that ending Israeli aggression is the most immediate concern, even before a formal security agreement can be debated. Once this issue is addressed, discussions on peace and the status of the Golan Heights could potentially begin.
Should negotiations resume, they are expected to revisit previously discussed elements. These include the establishment of security zones near the Israeli border, which might encompass a United Nations-present buffer zone and designated areas for varying Syrian force deployments. A firm commitment from Israel to halt military actions could pave the way for substantial diplomatic progress toward a comprehensive security framework. Conversely, a continuation of Israeli strikes and its military presence without a clear pledge to withdraw would likely perpetuate the current stalemate, extending regional instability and complicating US mediation endeavors, prolonging the decades-long animosity.