US has ‘lost control of its own foreign policy’, says Oman’s foreign minister
Oman's Foreign Minister criticized US foreign policy, alleging Israeli influence led to confrontation with Iran despite nuclear talks.
Lauren Collins ·

Oman's Foreign Minister, Badr Albusaidi, recently asserted that the United States has relinquished control over its foreign policy direction. Speaking on February 26, Albusaidi specifically pointed to alleged Israeli influence on the Trump administration, suggesting it led to a shift towards confrontation with Iran. These comments were published in The Economist following a period of Omani mediation in nuclear discussions.
Albusaidi's statements emerged after his involvement in mediating nuclear negotiations between Iran and the U.S. in Geneva. He facilitated discussions that included U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. The Omani minister characterized the subsequent escalation of tensions as a "catastrophe" and a significant misjudgment.
Nuclear Talks and Subsequent Escalation
According to Albusaidi, the nuclear negotiations in February were on the brink of a substantial agreement. A final stage of these talks was reportedly scheduled to take place in Vienna the following week. However, within 48 hours of the Geneva meeting's conclusion, the U.S. and Israel initiated military actions against Iran.
Albusaidi attributed this abrupt change in U.S. policy to the influence of Israeli leadership. He claimed that Israel persuaded former President Donald Trump to pursue a military path, based on the premise of Iran's "unconditional surrender" following the hypothetical assassination of its supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. This perspective suggests a direct link between external lobbying and U.S. strategic decisions.
Call for De-escalation and Diplomacy
The Omani Foreign Minister advocated for an immediate cessation of hostilities and a return to direct bilateral negotiations. He argued that achieving Israel's stated objectives through military means would necessitate a protracted conflict, likely involving the deployment of U.S. ground forces. This highlights a concern for regional stability and the potential for prolonged military engagement.
Oman has historically positioned itself as a neutral mediator in regional disputes, particularly those involving Iran and Western powers. This diplomatic stance allows Muscat to facilitate dialogue and offer alternative pathways to conflict resolution. The recent remarks underscore Oman's continued commitment to de-escalation and its perspective on the complexities of Middle Eastern geopolitics.
Regional Context and Future Outlook
S. role in maintaining regional security. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the international nuclear agreement with Iran, has been a central point of contention, with the Trump administration withdrawing from it in 2018. Albusaidi's comments reflect a view that diplomatic avenues were prematurely abandoned in favor of military pressure.
Future developments will likely hinge on the willingness of all parties to re-engage in diplomatic processes. The Omani perspective suggests that a return to negotiation, rather than military confrontation, offers a more viable path to stability in the Persian Gulf region. The implications for global energy markets and international trade routes, which traverse this critical region, remain significant.
Implications
Country Impact: Oman's statements underscore its role as a regional mediator, potentially influencing diplomatic efforts between Iran and Western nations. The criticism could strain U.S.-Oman relations, though Oman typically maintains a balanced foreign policy.
Industry Impact: Increased tensions in the Persian Gulf, as implied by the minister's comments, could lead to volatility in global oil and gas markets due to concerns over supply disruptions. Shipping and insurance industries operating in the Strait of Hormuz may face heightened risks.
Market Impact: Geopolitical instability in the Middle East often triggers risk-off sentiment in global financial markets, potentially leading to increased demand for safe-haven assets like gold and government bonds. Equity markets, particularly those with exposure to energy sectors, could experience fluctuations.