‘One in, one out’ asylum seekers sent to France return to UK in lorries

Asylum seekers removed to France are reportedly re-entering the UK via lorries, indicating a shift in irregular migration tactics.

Lauren Collins ·

‘One in, one out’ asylum seekers sent to France return to UK in lorries

Asylum seekers previously removed from the United Kingdom to France under a bilateral agreement have reportedly re-entered the UK using lorries. This development, observed in late March, suggests an evolving strategy by individuals seeking asylum and potentially by human smuggling networks. At least four individuals, who had initially arrived in the UK by small boats, were identified as having returned within a two-week period.

Two of these individuals are currently held in detention facilities, while the other two are reportedly residing in London.

Shifting Migration Patterns

Historically, lorries were a primary method for irregular crossings into the UK across the English Channel before 2018. Enhanced security measures in northern France subsequently led to a significant increase in small boat crossings. However, recent reports indicate that smugglers are now offering lorry routes again, despite these being considerably more expensive—three to four times the cost of dinghy crossings.

Government Response and Policy

The UK Home Office maintains that individuals detected after returning from a removal to France are detained. The stated policy is to repatriate these individuals to France as swiftly as possible. This situation highlights the ongoing challenges in managing irregular migration flows and the adaptability of smuggling operations in response to border control efforts.

Critiques of Current Agreements

Human rights organizations, such as Amnesty International UK, have voiced concerns regarding the effectiveness and ethical implications of the current "one in, one out" agreement between the UK and France. Critics argue that such policies, which involve returning asylum seekers to France, may inadvertently empower smuggling networks by restricting safe and legal pathways for individuals seeking protection.

The lack of accessible legal routes is often cited as a factor driving individuals towards dangerous and illicit means of entry.

Broader Context of Cross-Channel Migration

The re-emergence of lorry crossings occurs amidst continued high numbers of small boat arrivals, indicating a multifaceted approach by those attempting to reach the UK. The dynamic nature of these migration routes underscores the complex interplay between border security measures, human smuggling tactics, and international asylum policies. Governments face persistent pressure to develop comprehensive strategies that address both security concerns and humanitarian obligations.

Future Implications for Border Security

This shift in tactics could necessitate a re-evaluation of border security strategies, particularly concerning freight traffic entering the UK. The increased cost associated with lorry routes also suggests a potential for higher profits for smuggling organizations, which could incentivize further exploitation of this method. Monitoring these evolving patterns is crucial for policymakers in both the UK and France as they seek to manage irregular migration across the Channel.

Implications

Country Impact: The UK faces renewed challenges in border security, potentially requiring adjustments to freight inspection protocols. France may also experience increased pressure on its asylum system if more individuals are returned from the UK.

Industry Impact: The logistics and freight industry could face heightened scrutiny and potential disruptions at border crossings due to increased checks for irregular migrants. Smuggling networks may see increased profitability from more expensive lorry routes.

Market Impact: There are no direct immediate market impacts, but sustained irregular migration could influence public spending on border security and asylum services, potentially affecting national budgets and related sectors.

More stories