El Al cancels Tel Aviv–Hanoi route after Shin Bet withholds clearance

El Al canceled its planned Tel Aviv–Hanoi route after Shin Bet did not grant the security authorization the airline said it needed.

Lauren Collins ·

El Al cancels Tel Aviv–Hanoi route after Shin Bet withholds clearance

El Al said it has canceled plans to launch a Tel Aviv–Hanoi route after Israel’s domestic security service, Shin Bet, did not provide the security authorization the airline said it needs to operate the service.

The airline said it sought approval from Israel’s security establishment but was informed it could not obtain the required clearances for the route. El Al did not say which security conditions could not be met.

The cancellation is an unusual on-the-record example of a security review shaping an airline network decision, even when a carrier is prepared to market and operate flights.

What El Al said about approval

El Al framed the decision as an inability to secure authorizations rather than a commercial pullback. The company did not specify whether the clearance issue was tied to the destination, overflight considerations, or arrangements on the ground.

Shin Bet, formally the Israel Security Agency, is Israel’s domestic security service and plays a central role in counterterrorism and internal security. In civil aviation, it is part of a stringent security environment applied to Israeli carriers, reflecting a history of threats targeting Israeli aviation; El Al in particular is widely associated with enhanced security procedures compared with many other airlines.

Connectivity and remaining unknowns

El Al’s planned expansion to new destinations typically requires coordination with Israeli security authorities alongside standard civil aviation and airport-side arrangements. The company did not indicate whether it will revisit the Tel Aviv–Hanoi plan under revised conditions.

For Israel, new aviation links can carry practical and diplomatic weight by supporting tourism and business travel and signaling engagement. When a security agency blocks a route, it can narrow commercial options and complicate how partners interpret connectivity decisions, particularly where diplomacy and trade are sensitive to perceptions of risk.

Direct routes also shape travel time and airline economics, potentially shifting passenger flows through hubs and alternative connections.

Next public signals by August 31, 2024 By August 31, 2024, the next key signal would be a named comment from Shin Bet or the Israeli government clarifying the basis for the denial. Observers will also be watching for any El Al update on revised security arrangements, routing changes, or alternative Southeast Asia destinations, and for any official Vietnamese reaction if the cancellation becomes part of bilateral discussions.

More stories