Democrats Request Perjury Probe for Ex-DHS Secretary Noem

Democrats Durbin and Raskin requested a perjury probe for former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem over alleged false statements to Congress on March 16, 2026.

Lauren Collins ·

Democrats Request Perjury Probe for Ex-DHS Secretary Noem

Two prominent Democratic lawmakers have formally requested the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem for alleged perjury and making false statements to Congress. Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) submitted their referral to Attorney General Pam Bondi on Monday, March 16, 2026.

The request centers on Noem's testimony before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees earlier in the month, specifically on March 3 and March 4, 2026. During these appearances, Noem addressed various issues, including immigration enforcement policies and a significant DHS contract.

Allegations of Misleading Statements

Durbin and Raskin contend that Noem provided inaccurate information regarding DHS's compliance with court orders related to immigration enforcement. They also raised concerns about her statements concerning the bidding process for a $220 million television advertising campaign, suggesting potential irregularities.

Further allegations include Noem's remarks on the detention of U.S. citizens and the general conditions within detention facilities. These claims form the basis of the lawmakers' call for a perjury investigation by the Justice Department.

DHS Response and Political Context

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security has refuted the allegations, labeling them as "categorically FALSE." The referral to the Justice Department does not automatically trigger an investigation, and the Democratic lawmakers have publicly expressed skepticism about the likelihood of the department pursuing the matter.

Their low expectations stem from concerns about what they perceive as the partisan weaponization of the Justice Department. This political backdrop adds a layer of complexity to the referral, highlighting ongoing tensions between the legislative and executive branches.

Recent Leadership Change at DHS

The referral follows a recent change in leadership at the Department of Homeland Security. President Donald Trump dismissed Secretary Noem earlier in March 2026. Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) has been nominated as her successor and is currently awaiting Senate confirmation.

This leadership transition occurred shortly before the perjury probe request, indicating a period of significant flux within the department. The timing of these events underscores the heightened political scrutiny surrounding immigration policy and government contracting.

Implications for Congressional Oversight

The request for a perjury investigation highlights the ongoing efforts by Congress to exercise oversight over executive branch agencies. Such referrals are a mechanism for lawmakers to challenge the veracity of testimony provided by government officials, aiming to ensure accountability.

While the immediate outcome of this specific referral remains uncertain, it signals continued legislative pressure on the administration regarding its handling of immigration and departmental operations. The Justice Department's decision on whether to initiate an investigation will be closely watched by political observers and stakeholders in immigration policy.

Implications

Country Impact: The referral could intensify political polarization within the U.S. government, particularly between the Democratic-led Congress and the executive branch. It may also influence public perception of government accountability and the integrity of official testimony.

Industry Impact: The allegations regarding the $220 million advertising contract could lead to increased scrutiny of government procurement processes and contracting firms involved in federal campaigns. This might prompt stricter oversight or revised bidding procedures in the future.

Market Impact: While direct market impact is limited, heightened political uncertainty and investigations into government officials can occasionally contribute to broader market cautiousness. The focus on government spending and contracting could affect specific sectors involved in federal services.

More stories