Analyst Warns Saudi-Pakistan-Turkey Alignment Could Reshape Mideast Power

An emerging alignment between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey risks entrenching political Islam and hindering Middle East prosperity, says Joshua Bijan.

Omar Farouk ·

Analyst Warns Saudi-Pakistan-Turkey Alignment Could Reshape Mideast Power

Saudi-Pakistan-Turkey Alignment Questioned

An emerging alignment among Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey could reshape the Middle East's power dynamics and entrench an "ideological framework of political Islam," potentially blocking commercial prosperity, analyst Joshua Bijan warned this week. This assessment suggests a significant shift in regional political and economic trajectories, moving beyond traditional alliances and impacting ongoing diversification efforts in the region.

Bijan's comments highlight concerns that the combined influence of these three nations might hinder economic growth, particularly as Saudi Arabia pursues its Vision 2030 initiatives, which aim to diversify its economy away from oil. The analyst suggested such an alignment could impede the broader commercial integration necessary for sustained economic development in the Middle East.

Regional Context for Shifting Alliances

Saudi Arabia has recently expanded its diplomatic and Saudi Arabia has recently expanded its diplomatic and economic engagements beyond its traditional Western partners, seeking greater influence across the broader Islamic world. This includes intensified cooperation with Pakistan, a long-standing security ally, and a measured rapprochement with Turkey, following years of strained relations. These moves are viewed in the context of broader geopolitical shifts, including China's growing presence in the region and a perceived rebalancing of power away from the United States. Pakistan maintains strong historical and military ties with Saudi Arabia, frequently participating in joint military exercises and receiving significant financial aid. Turkey, under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has increasingly projected its influence across the Middle East and North Africa, often described as a 'neo-Ottoman' foreign policy. This posture sometimes brought it into conflict with Saudi interests, but recent years have seen efforts to mend these relations, driven by shared economic interests and a desire for greater regional autonomy. Broader Implications for the Middle East Such an alignment carries substantial implications for the regional balance of power, particularly in a Middle East already contending with the Israel-Hamas conflict and Iran's persistent regional activities. A more cohesive bloc centered on Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey could challenge existing security architectures and diplomatic forums like the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), which comprises Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. It could also influence discussions within OPEC+, the group of oil-producing nations that includes OPEC members and other major producers like Russia.

Turkey Alignment Questioned An Economically, if this alignment indeed promotes an ideologically-driven framework, it could complicate efforts to foster open markets and attract global investment. For instance, Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 depends on robust international partnerships and a perception of secularized economic governance. Any shift toward an overtly religious-political bloc could deter foreign direct investment and impede the modernization of financial and trade sectors across the region.

Paths Forward for Regional Stability

The main open question is whether a formal defense pact or a major joint investment fund will materialize between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey by September 1, 2024. If they announce such institutionalized cooperation, it would signal the consolidation of a new power axis impacting global macro stability, potentially altering crude oil prices and shipping security through critical waterways like the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab al-Mandab. Conversely, if their collaboration remains limited to bilateral agreements or symbolic gestures, the impact on global macro dynamics, specific companies, and the wider industry would likely be minimal, retaining the current fragmented regional power distribution.

More stories