Iran State Media Shapes Conflict Narrative
Iranian state media actively shapes conflict narratives, using selective reporting and AI-generated disinformation to control public perception.
Lauren Collins ·

Iranian state-controlled media outlets have actively managed the public discourse surrounding recent regional conflicts, employing a mix of factual reporting and disinformation. This strategy aims to influence domestic perception and maintain support for the government. The approach involves selective reporting, downplaying adverse events, and amplifying narratives that align with state interests.
Following initial international reports on February 28 regarding the health of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iranian state television initially withheld information. Presenters later dismissed these reports as unfounded rumors, only addressing them the subsequent morning. This incident illustrates a broader pattern of information control observed during the conflict.
Disinformation Tactics Employed
The conflict has reportedly resulted in over 1,200 fatalities within Iran and has extended into neighboring countries. State media, including IRTV3 and the semi-official Tasnim news agency, have consistently highlighted civilian casualties and calls for retribution against perceived adversaries. Their coverage also emphasized loyalty to the Islamic Republic, while largely omitting details concerning military and governmental sites targeted by opposing forces.
For example, on March 3, the Tasnim news agency, which has ties to Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), asserted that 650 U.S. military personnel had died in the initial two days of the conflict. This claim significantly diverged from official U.S. figures, which reported six U.S. soldier deaths at that time, increasing to thirteen by March 13.
Use of Advanced Propaganda Methods
New technological tools, including artificial intelligence, have been integrated into these disinformation campaigns. Press TV, an English-language state-run news channel, disseminated an AI-generated video depicting a burning structure in Bahrain, falsely attributing it to an Iranian attack. The video was later removed from Facebook.
According to Brett Schafer of the Institute of Strategic Dialogue, the deployment of AI-generated forgeries by prominent state media organizations indicates a deliberate and consistent strategy to distort reality in their conflict reporting. This method allows for the creation of fabricated visual evidence to support state narratives.
Broader Context of Media Control
Iran's government has a long history of exercising tight control over its media landscape, particularly during periods of political tension or conflict. This control extends to both traditional and digital platforms, aiming to prevent the spread of information deemed detrimental to national security or public order. The current conflict highlights an evolution in these tactics, incorporating advanced digital tools to enhance their effectiveness.
This systematic approach to information management is crucial for the Iranian government to shape public opinion domestically and project a specific image internationally. By controlling the narrative, authorities can rally support, deflect criticism, and manage expectations regarding the conflict's progression and outcomes.
Implications
Country Impact: The Iranian government's media control strategy aims to consolidate domestic support and manage public perception during conflicts. This can suppress dissent and influence national unity, but may also lead to distrust if discrepancies with external reporting become widely known.
Industry Impact: The media industry, particularly state-controlled entities, is increasingly leveraging advanced technologies like AI for content creation and dissemination. This trend raises concerns about the proliferation of deepfakes and manipulated information, impacting journalistic integrity and public trust in news sources.
Market Impact: Disinformation campaigns can create uncertainty and volatility in regional markets by distorting the true extent or impact of conflicts. False reports on casualties or military engagements can influence investor sentiment and commodity prices, particularly in energy-rich regions.