Zelenskyy faults Fedorov as Patriot stocks shrink in Ukraine
Zelenskyy criticized dismissed Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov while warning that Patriot missile supplies have fallen as Russian attacks intensify.
Hazal Anyalı ·

Zelenskyy publicly criticized dismissed defense minister Mykhailo Fedorov as Ukraine faces Patriot missile shortages and Russian attacks.
The Ukrainian president gave his first public account of the rupture in a transcript released Sunday, after a Saturday session with reporters that lasted two hours and had initially been off the record. His comments put a political dispute inside Kyiv beside two battlefield pressures: air-defense shortages and Russian missile strikes.
Fedorov break becomes public
Zelenskyy said Fedorov had moved, or been pushed, toward steps he considered mistaken. He pointed to Fedorov's participation in large demonstrations and demands for elections, while also saying he retained a favorable personal view of him.
The dismissal has become one of the more visible signs of strain inside Ukraine's wartime leadership. Zelenskyy's decision to address it directly suggests the government is trying to contain the political damage while keeping attention on the war effort.
The president also linked the Defense Ministry to problems beyond personnel. He referred to questionable choices over military spending and said inaccurate ministry information contributed to an uncomfortable exchange with President Trump about Starlink's role inside Russia.
Patriot stocks thin out
Zelenskyy used the same discussion to describe a widening gap in Patriot air-defense missiles, the interceptors Ukraine relies on against Russian ballistic attacks. He said deliveries from Western partners have fallen over the past three years, while Russian missile strikes have grown more intense.
The Patriot issue is both military and diplomatic. If the flow of interceptors remains limited, Ukrainian commanders have fewer options to protect cities, energy sites and military infrastructure from ballistic missiles that are harder to stop with older systems.
The numbers disclosed by Zelenskyy were presented as evidence of a supply problem, not as an independent inventory of Ukraine's air-defense stockpile. Without a second public accounting from suppliers or Ukraine's Defense Ministry, the scale of the shortfall remains tied to the president's account.
Western governments have treated air defense as a central part of support for Kyiv since Russia expanded missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities and power networks. Patriot batteries are among the most valuable systems in that mix because they can intercept threats that many other platforms cannot.
Dnipropetrovsk gain narrows map
Zelenskyy balanced the missile warning with a more favorable battlefield update. He said Ukrainian forces had nearly cleared the Dnipropetrovsk region, leaving Russian troops with about 10 square kilometers under their control.
The figure gives Kyiv a concrete territorial marker at a time when front-line reports are often fragmented and difficult to verify from outside the war zone. It also allows the presidency to frame local gains against the broader pressure from Russian long-range strikes.
Dnipropetrovsk matters because it sits behind parts of the eastern front and holds industrial, transport and population centers that support Ukraine's war economy. A smaller Russian footprint there would help Kyiv present the region as more secure, though Zelenskyy's statement did not remove the risk of renewed attacks.
Kyiv faces three pressure points
The immediate path turns on three linked questions: whether allies restore Patriot deliveries, whether the Fedorov dispute expands into a larger political challenge, and whether the Dnipropetrovsk gains hold. Each would affect Ukraine differently, from budget planning in Kyiv to weapons production schedules abroad.
If Patriot deliveries stay below Ukraine's stated needs, the macro effect would likely come through renewed pressure on infrastructure and energy security, with costs carried by public finances and reconstruction plans. For Zelenskyy's government, the burden would be operational and political; for the defense industry, demand for interceptors and air-defense components would remain above available supply.
If allies accelerate shipments instead, Ukraine would gain more room to defend priority targets and manage winter or peak-strike periods. That would ease pressure on Kyiv's command decisions, while pushing Western manufacturers and governments to match pledges with production, procurement and delivery timetables.
If Fedorov's removal remains contained, the presidency can keep the argument focused on wartime discipline and defense management. If it widens, Ukraine's partners will watch whether internal politics affects budget decisions, mobilization debates or the timing of any future election discussion.