Saina Nehwal urges medals-table as India’s true test

Saina Nehwal said Saturday India should measure sporting progress by consistent medals-table ranking at major events, not one-off breakthroughs.

Mei Lin ·

Saina Nehwal urges medals-table as India’s true test

Former world No. 1 badminton player and Olympic medallist Saina Nehwal said on Saturday that India should assess its progress as a “sporting nation” by where it finishes on major international medals tables.

Her remarks, carried by Indian broadcaster NDTV, argued that repeated high placement across major events matters more than occasional standout results. Nehwal said that consistent medals-table performance should be the benchmark for national sporting status.

India’s elite-sport push and the measurement debate

Nehwal’s comments come as India continues a decade-long Nehwal’s comments come as India continues a decade-long effort to build a stronger pipeline for elite athletes through targeted backing for Olympic disciplines. The push has aimed to make training environments more professional and competitive results more repeatable, according to the source material. Officials and administrators have focused on sports including badminton, wrestling, boxing, shooting, and athletics. Within that strategy, Nehwal’s medals-table argument effectively shifts attention from isolated successes to whether the system can produce results across multiple cycles and competitions. TOPS and high-performance centers as core support tools The source material highlights the expansion of support structures designed to help top athletes prepare for international competition. It cites programs such as the Target Olympic Podium Scheme (TOPS) and the Sports Authority of India’s high-performance centers as key elements in improving coaching, training standards, and wider athlete support.

Saina Nehwal

In this framework, badminton is described as one of the clearest and most visible success stories. The source material says Nehwal’s rise helped bring badminton into India’s mainstream, and that India has since developed multiple medal contenders across men’s and women’s singles and doubles.

Badminton’s gains versus the broader medals-table gap

Despite higher visibility and stronger outcomes in some disciplines, the source material says India’s overall medal counts at the Olympics and other multi-sport events have remained modest compared with top-tier sporting powers. That contrast sits at the center of Nehwal’s view that the medals table is the most direct yardstick of national sporting progress.

The source material also frames medals tables as more than a sporting record. For large Asian economies, it says medals-table standings can act as a shorthand indicator linked to state capacity, youth development, health outcomes, and soft power, especially when paired with hosting ambitions and growth in the sports industry.

How a medals-table-first lens could reshape priorities

According to the source material, if policymakers and sponsors adopt Nehwal’s approach, pressure could move toward disciplines that offer higher medal density and clearer repeatable pathways, such as shooting or wrestling. It adds that sports where results depend heavily on a small number of star athletes could face tougher scrutiny under a medals-table-first metric.

The same shift could influence funding priorities, imports of coaching expertise, talent identification systems, and the commercialization of Olympic sports across South Asia, the source material says. One open question remains whether authorities and major government-backed programs will formally elevate medals-table rank as a primary definition of success.

Signals officials could send ahead of future multi-sport events The source material points to a practical sign to watch: whether Indian sports authorities or major government-backed programs begin publicly setting explicit medals-table targets for upcoming multi-sport events and link funding criteria to those targets.

It adds that confirmation would be expected through official announcements or policy documents that cite medals-table rank as a main performance metric. If official messaging instead continues to focus on participation, finalist totals, or sport-by-sport development goals, the source material says that would be less aligned with Nehwal’s framing.

More stories