Tasmania apologizes for retained autopsy specimens

The Tasmanian government apologized in parliament on Tuesday for the unauthorized retention and display of human body parts collected during coronial autopsies between 1966 and 1991. An investigation found 177 human specimens were transferred to the University of Tasmania’s RA Rodda Pathology Museum without consent from families or the coroner.

The inquiry began after concerns were raised in 2016 about whether several items on display had been obtained without permission. The state coroner ordered an investigation in April 2023, and findings were delivered in September.

Officials said the specimens included organs and tissue samples and were removed from display in 2018. The practices ended about 35 years ago, but the government said the impact on families has continued.

Investigation links transfers to pathologists

The investigation concluded that pathologists provided coronial specimens to the museum, including Dr. Royal Cummings, who was identified as providing the majority of the material. The findings also indicated that other pathologists may have engaged in similar practices over time.

The specimens were taken from autopsies ordered by coroners, which are typically carried out as part of inquiries into unexpected or unusual deaths, including deaths in custody. The transfers occurred without approval from either the families or the coroners responsible for the bodies.

University issues apology and reviews its role

The state’s health minister delivered the apology to lawmakers, acknowledging the distress caused to families of the deceased. Several family members attended the parliamentary session, according to officials.

The University of Tasmania’s deputy vice-chancellor for health also apologized, acknowledging the institution’s role and saying staff had met with affected families. The RA Rodda Pathology Museum was established in 1966 to support teaching and research in medical sciences.

Authorities have not indicated what further steps will follow beyond the removal of specimens from display and the apologies. Families are expected to continue seeking answers about how the specimens were collected and handled.