US President Directs Federal Housing Deregulation

The US President issued an executive order directing federal agencies to reduce regulatory barriers impacting housing construction and affordability.

Lauren Collins ·

US President Directs Federal Housing Deregulation

The U.S. President has issued an executive order aimed at reducing federal regulatory obstacles to housing construction and affordability. Announced on March 13, 2026, the directive targets various agencies to review and revise regulations perceived as hindering residential development across the nation.

Key federal departments and agencies are now tasked with identifying and modifying rules that impact housing costs and construction timelines. This initiative seeks to streamline processes for new housing projects, particularly in suburban areas and for single-family homes, addressing concerns about housing supply and affordability.

Regulatory Review Mandates

Under the executive order, the Secretary of the Army and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are specifically directed to re-evaluate requirements related to stormwater management, wetlands, and other water body protections. The objective is to identify areas where regulations can be adjusted to lower housing development costs without compromising environmental standards.

Further directives extend to the Secretaries of Commerce, Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Transportation, alongside the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). These officials are instructed to examine and potentially reform programs and eliminate regulations that impede residential construction. The focus includes reducing burdens on affordable housing initiatives.

Energy and Environmental Streamlining

Additional provisions of the order target energy efficiency and environmental compliance. The Secretaries of Agriculture, HUD, and Energy, along with the FHFA Director, are mandated to review and potentially eliminate or reform energy-efficiency, water-use, and alternative-energy requirements deemed overly burdensome for housing projects. This aims to reduce construction costs associated with these standards.

The Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality and the Chairman of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation are also involved. They are tasked with developing guidance to streamline federal permitting processes under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act. This measure is intended to reduce administrative hurdles for housing developers.

State and Local Best Practices

In a related effort, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is directed to compile and disseminate best practices for state and local governments within 60 days of the order. These guidelines are intended to encourage local jurisdictions to adopt policies that promote housing construction and enhance affordability, fostering a more consistent approach nationwide.

This executive action reflects a broader federal strategy to address the ongoing housing supply crisis and rising costs. By targeting regulatory frameworks at multiple levels, the administration aims to stimulate new construction and improve access to affordable housing options for American families.

Implications

Country Impact: The executive order could lead to a reduction in housing construction costs and potentially increase housing supply across the U.S., particularly in suburban regions. This may alleviate some pressure on housing affordability for consumers.

Industry Impact: The construction and real estate industries could experience a more streamlined regulatory environment, potentially accelerating project timelines and reducing compliance expenses. Environmental consulting and related sectors might see shifts in demand for their services.

Market Impact: Reduced regulatory burdens could positively impact the housing market by increasing inventory, which might temper price growth. Investors in real estate development and related financial instruments could see improved project viability and returns.

More stories