Football doctors seek concussion role after 2-day Zurich forum
BJSM editorial says a May 2025 meeting brought club doctors, players and unions into discussions on sideline concussion practice.
A British Journal of Sports Medicine editorial published Friday, Oct. 9, said a two-day Head Injuries in Football Conference in Zurich on May 27-28, 2025, gathered elite football clinicians and player representatives.
Evidence grade: Claim (no study cited). The editorial concerns policy process, not a clinical trial, and says the forum focused on applying existing concussion guidance across clubs and leagues rather than drafting a new guideline.
The meeting drew physicians responsible for professional men’s and women’s teams, according to the editorial by Florent Aziri, Niko Mihic, Reto Huber and Malte Christian Claussen. Named clubs included Real Madrid, AS Monaco, AS Roma, Brighton & Hove Albion, New York City Football Club, Grasshoppers Club Zurich and FC Utrecht.
National-team representation included Swiss, Dutch and Belgian teams, the editorial said. Physiotherapists, clinical neurologists, neuroscientists, professional players and player-union representatives also took part.
The organisers invited speakers from Major League Baseball’s New York Yankees and the National Football League to discuss sideline concussion management in other elite sports, according to the editorial. The comparison was framed as a way to identify shared operational problems for football decision-makers.
The forum’s institutional framing matters because concussion decisions in elite sport are made under time pressure, competition demands and medical uncertainty. The editorial says the event was designed to surface practical experience from people involved in those decisions, including team physicians and players.
The meeting was convened by the Sports Doctors Network and the Swiss Association of Football Players, which is a member of Asociación Internacional de Futbolistas, the editorial said. It was not organised or financially supported by international sports federations, according to the authors.
The University of Zurich provided scientific support for programme development and for structuring and moderating discussions, the editorial said. Conference funding came mainly from participant registration fees, with support from ETS Diagnostics, the Sports Doctors Network and the Swiss Association of Football Players.
The editorial cannot show whether this participatory approach improves concussion diagnosis, return-to-play decisions or long-term brain health. It reports a meeting and its rationale, not injury rates, clinical outcomes or an evaluation of policy changes.
The article was not commissioned and was externally peer reviewed, according to BJSM. Claussen is listed as an associate editor of the journal; the authors declared no other competing interests.
Source: editorial, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Oct. 9, 2026.
Atlas360 reports health research and does not provide medical advice.
More stories
- Conflict-zone athletes face sleep stress standard plans miss
- Tai Chi may ease pain in musculoskeletal disorders
- Peptide access push may obscure patient harm reports
- Emergence of Youth Support Networks Addressing Polycrisis-Induced Mental Health Risks
- Ebola Outbreak Escalates in Congo Amid Security and Operational Failures
- Measles Mortality Increases Amidst Declining U.S. Vaccination Coverage
- Preclinical Trial of KCL-286 Shows Potential for Alzheimer’s Intervention
- Coffee consumption guidance shifts in new AHA heart report
Latest news
- Fed finds debt delinquencies hit post-2010 high
- Regulatory Divergence in European Football Financial Governance
- Rwanda Secures 10-Year Formula 1 Hosting Rights Starting Early 2030s
- Operational Failures in Formula 1 Race Control Impact Competitive Integrity
- Treasure Global targets health distribution with 6-month MOU
- Eldorado Gold turns $100 into $379.88 in five years
- Netflix Secures Exclusive Spanish Broadcasting Rights for 2030 World Cup
- MI5 Says Iran Targets UK Military Sites

