The Justice Department is investigating the NFL's media rights deals for potential anticompetitive practices amid rising costs for fans to watch games.
At issue is the 1961 Sports Broadcasting Act, which allows the league to collectively sell TV rights, a practice now clashing with modern streaming fragmentation.
The NFL defends its model, citing high viewership and the local availability of 87% of its games, even when streamed nationally.

Atlas AI
The U.S. Department of Justice has opened an antitrust investigation into the NFL, examining whether the league’s methods for selling and distributing broadcasting rights involve anticompetitive conduct. The review follows rising complaints from consumers, regulators, and members of Congress about the growing cost and increasing complexity of watching NFL games.
Officials have not made public the full scope of the inquiry. The Justice Department and the NFL have both declined to comment, leaving unresolved which specific contracts, platforms, or practices are being scrutinized and what legal theories may be applied.
Central to the concerns is the NFL’s approach of spreading games across traditional broadcast television, cable networks, and exclusive streaming services. Critics argue that this structure can force fans to maintain multiple subscriptions to follow teams throughout a season, raising the total price of access and reducing straightforward viewing options.
The investigation also brings renewed attention to the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961, a federal law that provides the NFL a limited antitrust exemption. Under that statute, NFL teams can negotiate and sell television broadcast rights collectively as a single package, a model that has supported the league’s media business for more than 60 years.
Critics have questioned whether the current marketplace—now including major streaming platforms such as Amazon and Peacock—has shifted distribution in ways that extend beyond what the 1961 framework was designed to address. The Justice Department’s review is expected to weigh the league’s claims about access against allegations that the overall structure of rights sales and distribution harms consumers through higher prices and fewer simple ways to watch.
The NFL has defended its strategy as accessible and beneficial for fans. The league says approximately 87% of its games are still available on free, over-the-air local television, and it says that when a game is exclusive to a national streaming service, the game is still shown on local television in the home markets of the two teams playing, which it describes as a safeguard for local access.
As part of its defense, the NFL has pointed to audience performance, saying its 2025 season delivered record viewership and was the highest since 1989. While the outcome of the federal review is unknown, the investigation represents a significant look at the NFL’s dominant media model and could influence how sports media rights are packaged and sold in the United States.
Because major streaming platforms participate in U.S. sports distribution, the inquiry also carries international relevance for global media companies and for cross-border investors tracking the economics of premium live content. Key uncertainties remain, including which arrangements are under review and whether officials will outline potential enforcement steps.


