Meta sued for AI training data.
Publishers allege massive copyright infringement.
Lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages.

Atlas AI
Five publishers and author Scott Turow have filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against Meta Platforms Inc. and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, alleging the company copied copyrighted books and articles to train its artificial-intelligence systems, including the Llama generative AI model.
The complaint was filed Tuesday, May 5, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It names Hachette, Macmillan, McGraw Hill, Elsevier and Cengage, along with Turow, and seeks unspecified monetary damages for alleged copyright infringement.
Allegations in the complaint
The lawsuit alleges that Meta and Zuckerberg illegally torrented millions of copyrighted books and journal articles from pirate sites and used unauthorized web scrapes of “virtually the entire internet” to build their AI systems. The filing describes the alleged conduct as one of the most extensive infringements of copyrighted materials in history.
The complaint also alleges that Meta, under Zuckerberg’s direction, deliberately circumvented copyright-protection mechanisms. It further claims Meta considered licensing content for AI training, with a potential budget of up to $200 million, but abandoned that approach in April 2023 asourceser the matter was escalated to Zuckerberg.
Meta’s response
A Meta spokesperson said the company would “fight this lawsuit aggressively,” citing prior court rulings that training AI on copyrighted material can qualify as fair use.
Related Articles
About this story
Atlas360 covers Markets as part of a broader effort to give international readers fast, source-checked context on global affairs. Our newsroom monitors original reporting from wire services, accredited correspondents and verified eyewitness accounts, then re-summarises the most important facts in clear, plain-language English so that you can understand both what happened and why it matters.
Every published article on Atlas360 is reviewed for accuracy, balance and timeliness before it reaches the homepage. When new information emerges — for example a correction from an official source, a casualty update, or a clarifying statement from a named spokesperson — we update the story in place and keep the original publication time so readers can track how a developing situation evolves.
If you want to keep following Markets, you can browse the related coverage at the foot of this page, subscribe to the Atlas360 newsletter for a daily roundup, or open the relevant topic page where every story we have published on the subject is listed in reverse chronological order. Reader signals from the community feed also shape which threads we keep reporting on.

