US jobless claims drop to 197,000 as layoffs stay near low
US jobless claims fell to 197,000 in the week ended September 19, while continuing claims stayed near a low last seen in 2023.
Jurgen Goldmeier ·

US jobless claims fell to 197,000 last week, keeping layoffs near historic lows in a steady labor market. Continuing claims held at 1.72 million.
The Labor Department said initial applications edged down by 1,000 in the week ended September 19. The reading was one of the lowest since 1969, placing the latest report near a half-century floor for layoffs.
Claims near 1969 floor
Continuing claims, a measure of people still receiving benefits, were little changed at 1.72 million in the week ended September 12. That level remained close to the lowest reading since 2023, according to the Labor Department data released Thursday.
The recent claims pattern has stayed near historic lows for several months, consistent with employers holding on to workers rather than making broad cuts. Hiring has been less even, leaving fewer openings for Americans trying to change jobs or return to work.
Six-week average declines
The four-week moving average of new applications fell to 202,250, the lowest in six weeks. That measure smooths weekly swings, making it useful when holidays, school calendars or state-level processing shifts distort a single report.
The seasonally adjusted headline fell, but raw claims moved higher before adjustment. The unadjusted increase was led by California, Hawaii and New York, showing that state-level patterns can diverge from the national reading in a given week.
A claims figure below 200,000 is low by historical standards and points to limited firing pressure. The counterweight is the uneven hiring backdrop, which can leave workers feeling locked into roles even when layoffs are rare.
Labor market paths split
If initial claims remain close to 197,000, the immediate signal would be that separations are still contained. Globally, that would support the view that US household income is holding up; for employers, it would point to retention over expansion; for staffing firms and recruiters, it would imply a slower placement market.
If claims start to move higher from these levels, the mechanism would be different. More job losses would put pressure on household income, reduce job-switching leverage and create a weaker backdrop for labor-linked industries such as staffing, payroll services and consumer-facing retail.
The main open question is whether low layoffs can persist while hiring stays uneven. A stable claims series would indicate a labor market cooling through fewer openings rather than job cuts, while a sustained rise in continuing claims would show unemployed workers taking longer to find work.