Australia Proposes Legislation to Let Social Media Users Opt Out of Algorithms
Australia's government has introduced draft legislation allowing social media users to opt out of algorithmic content, aiming for greater digital control.
Jason Kwon ·

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced new legislative proposals on Tuesday aimed at allowing social media users to disable algorithmic content curation. The planned digital duty of care legislation would require platforms to offer a distinct option for individuals to shift to chronological feeds.
Under the proposed framework, users could choose between engagement-driven algorithms and feeds displaying posts exclusively from accounts they actively follow. The initiative is designed to increase individual autonomy in how digital content is consumed.
Addressing Content Risks
Australian Prime Minister Anthony
The regulatory effort seeks to reduce specific online hazards, including radicalization, the spread of misinformation, and harmful content. Should the legislation be enacted, it would necessitate a change from current models that often prioritize content based on engagement metrics, which can include inflammatory material.
The government frames this measure as a means to empower consumers, avoiding the perception of state censorship. Officials stated that the focus remains on user choice within digital spaces rather than government intervention in the content itself.
Compliance Challenges
Similar legislation in Europe saw a Dutch court
Significant challenges are anticipated concerning the enforcement of the new rules, with concerns that technology companies might implement intentionally complicated opt-out processes. Similar legislation in Europe saw a Dutch court order Meta in 2025 to provide a simpler opt-out method after the platform automatically reverted users to algorithmic timelines.
The proposed legislation also faces an uncertain path through the Australian parliament. Political backing is not guaranteed, and some legislative factions may oppose broader provisions regarding online harms, potentially hindering its passage.