US, China Officials Discuss Trade in Paris
US and China officials met in Paris to discuss trade in agriculture, critical minerals, and new mechanisms, ahead of a potential presidential summit.
Lauren Collins ·

Senior economic representatives from the United States and China convened in Paris on Sunday, March 15, 2026, to address key trade issues. The discussions, characterized as "remarkably stable," focused on potential agreements in agricultural trade, critical minerals, and the establishment of new bilateral trade mechanisms. These talks are intended to lay groundwork for a potential summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later in March in Beijing.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng led the high-level engagement. A primary objective was to identify concrete "deliverables" that could be announced during the anticipated presidential meeting. Both sides explored avenues for enhancing economic cooperation and managing trade relations.
Agricultural Trade Expansion
China indicated a willingness to increase its imports of U.S. agricultural products. Specific items mentioned included poultry, beef, and various non-soybean row crops. This potential expansion builds upon an existing commitment by China to purchase 25 million metric tons of American soybeans annually over the next three years, signaling a broader interest in U.S. agricultural commodities.
New Bilateral Mechanisms Proposed
The discussions also involved proposals for formal structures to manage ongoing trade and investment. Officials considered establishing a U.S.-China "Board of Trade" and a "Board of Investment." The Board of Trade would aim to foster balanced trade growth while safeguarding national security interests and supply chain integrity. Concurrently, the Board of Investment would be tasked with resolving specific issues related to bilateral investment flows.
Critical Minerals and Energy Concerns
U.S. officials raised specific concerns regarding access to critical minerals, particularly yttrium, which is vital for the U.S. aerospace industry. The American delegation also advocated for increased Chinese procurement of U.S. manufactured goods, including Boeing jetliners, and energy resources such as coal, oil, and natural gas. Technical discussions on the proposed trade and investment mechanisms were slated to continue the following day.
Context of US-China Relations
-China trade relations, often marked by periods of tension and negotiation. Previous administrations have also sought to balance economic engagement with national security concerns, particularly regarding technology transfer and market access. These ongoing discussions reflect a continuous effort to stabilize and define the economic parameters of one of the world's most significant bilateral relationships.
The emphasis on specific sectors like agriculture and critical minerals highlights areas where mutual economic interests can potentially align, even amidst broader strategic competition. The proposed institutional mechanisms suggest a long-term approach to managing trade disputes and fostering predictable economic interactions between the two global powers.
Implications
Country Impact: For the United States, these talks could lead to increased agricultural exports and potentially more stable access to critical minerals. For China, securing agricultural imports and establishing structured dialogue mechanisms could help manage trade tensions and ensure economic predictability.
Industry Impact: The U.S. agricultural sector, particularly producers of poultry, beef, and non-soybean crops, stands to benefit from increased Chinese demand. The U.S. aerospace industry could see improved access to vital materials like yttrium, while energy sectors might find new export opportunities.
Market Impact: Positive outcomes from these discussions could provide a degree of stability to global markets, reducing uncertainty surrounding U.S.-China trade relations. Increased trade flows in specific sectors could influence commodity prices and investor sentiment towards both economies.