Survey puts business failure rate in DC at nation’s worst
Lending Tree found Washington, D.C., has the nation’s highest first-year business failure rate, with about one-third closing within a year.
Sophie McAlister ·

Business failure is hitting Washington, D.C., harder than any state, with Lending Tree finding about one-third of new firms close within a year.
The survey places the District at the top of the national rankings for first-year closures, a warning sign for founders trying to open restaurants, shops, service firms or professional practices across neighborhoods from Shaw to Capitol Hill. Lending Tree said the analysis drew on Bureau of Labor Statistics data to compare how young businesses fare after launch.
One-third close in year
Matt Schulz, chief consumer finance analyst at Lending Tree, described the District’s current startup climate in blunt terms. “Starting a new business is tough anywhere, but in D.C. right now, it’s as tough as it is anywhere in the country,” he said.
The first-year figure cited by Lending Tree was about 33%, compared with a roughly 20% rate Schulz said is commonly seen nationally. That gap matters because the first year is when many owners are still testing demand, building repeat customers and absorbing upfront costs before cash flow stabilizes.
Schulz said the Bureau of Labor Statistics figures showed the District had the steepest early failure rate in the country. He called that result “a daunting sign” for people considering whether to start a company in the nation’s capital.
Costs and churn shape risk
Several features of D.C.’s economy may make the launch window harder for small businesses, Schulz said. He pointed to high living costs, a population with frequent turnover, intense competition and the political character of the city as pressures that can complicate the path from opening day to durability.
Those factors can hit different kinds of businesses in different ways. A neighborhood cafe may depend on stable foot traffic and rent discipline, while a consulting firm may need a reliable pipeline of clients tied to government, advocacy or professional networks.
The District’s challenge also extends beyond city lines. Lending Tree’s survey ranked Maryland 11th and Virginia 15th for first-year business failures, meaning founders across the Washington region are operating in a market where early survival is not assured.
Survival gap widens over time
The District’s longer-term numbers were also weak in the Lending Tree survey. It found that 57% of D.C. entrepreneurs failed by the five-year mark, while 72% failed by year 10.
Those figures show that the risk does not end once a firm clears its first lease cycle or tax year. Young companies often face a second test when they need to renew financing, replace early customers, hire workers or adjust prices after initial demand becomes clearer.
For owners, Schulz’s advice centered on narrowing the business plan before spending heavily. He .
He also warned against entering the market without a clear reason customers should choose the new firm over existing options. “The last thing you want to do is go in without a good idea of what makes your business different,” Schulz said.
Founders face a narrower path
If D.C.’s first-year closure rate remains near one-third, lenders and landlords may look more closely at business plans, cash reserves and customer acquisition costs before extending credit or space. That would raise the preparation bar for individual founders and could favor operators with stronger balance sheets.
If the rate improves, the mechanism would likely be practical rather than symbolic: lower fixed costs, clearer demand, better targeting and more disciplined financing would give new firms longer to find stable revenue. That would help the District’s business base and ease pressure on sectors that rely on a constant flow of new local operators.
The next test is whether entrepreneurs and local support networks can turn the survey’s warning into better survival practices. For now, the numbers leave D.C. founders with less room for vague concepts, loose spending or an undefined customer base.